Wet Scrubber Design Calculation: A Step-by-Step Engineering Guide

Every environmental engineer eventually designs a wet scrubber. Whether it’s for acid gas removal (HCl, SO₂, HF), particulate control, or odor abatement, the fundamental design calculations are the same. This guide walks through the process from process conditions to vessel dimensions — with the actual equations you need.


Step 1: Define the Problem

Before touching a calculator, nail down these parameters:

Parameter Example Value How to Obtain
Gas flow rate 50,000 Nm³/h (wet) Process data or stack measurement
Inlet gas temperature 180°C Process data
Target outlet temperature 65°C (adiabatic saturation) Determined by scrubber type
Contaminant HCl Process knowledge
Inlet concentration 500 mg/Nm³ Measurement or mass balance
Required outlet concentration 10 mg/Nm³ Emission limit (GB 31573-2015, EU IED, etc.)
Required removal efficiency 98% (In – Out) / In × 100

Step 2: Determine Scrubber Type

Contaminant Preferred Scrubber Type Scrubbing Medium Typical Efficiency
HCl, HF, SO₂ (acid gases) Packed bed, counter-current NaOH solution (pH 7-9) 95-99%
SO₂ (high concentration) Spray tower with limestone slurry CaCO₃ slurry 90-98%
PM₁₀ / PM₂.₅ Venturi scrubber Water 90-99% (depends on ΔP)
Odor / VOCs Packed bed with oxidizing solution NaOCl or H₂O₂ 70-95%
NH₃ Packed bed with acid H₂SO₄ solution (pH 2-4) 95-99%

For this example: HCl removal → counter-current packed bed with NaOH solution.


Step 3: Gas-Liquid Equilibrium and Minimum Liquid Rate

The scrubbing liquid must provide enough reactive capacity:

Calculate HCl Loading


HCl mass flow = 50,000 Nm³/h × 500 mg/Nm³ × 10⁻⁶ kg/mg
= 25 kg/h HCl
`

Stoichiometric NaOH Requirement

`
HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O
36.5 g HCl reacts with 40 g NaOH

NaOH required = 25 kg/h × (40/36.5) = 27.4 kg/h NaOH (stoichiometric)
`

Practical NaOH Flow

In practice, you need excess reagent — the reaction is fast but mass transfer limits the rate:

`
Practical NaOH excess: 50-100% over stoichiometric
NaOH solution concentration: 5-10% wt (typical for HCl scrubbing)

At 100% excess, 5% solution:
NaOH mass flow = 27.4 × 2 = 54.8 kg/h
Solution flow = 54.8 / 0.05 = 1,096 kg/h ≈ 1.1 m³/h
`

Check Liquid-to-Gas Ratio (L/G)

`
L/G = Liquid mass flow / Gas mass flow
Gas mass flow ≈ 50,000 Nm³/h × 1.2 kg/Nm³ = 60,000 kg/h
L/G = 1,096 / 60,000 = 0.018 kg/kg = 18 L/1,000 Nm³
`

Typical L/G for packed bed acid gas scrubbers: 1.5-5 L/1,000 Nm³ per meter of packing. With 3 meters of packing: 4.5-15 L/1,000 Nm³. Our 18 L/1,000 Nm³ is slightly above the upper range, which is fine — higher L/G improves removal but increases pumping cost and pressure drop.


Step 4: Tower Diameter

The tower cross-section is determined by the flooding velocity:

Calculate Flooding Velocity (Eckert / Sherwood Correlation)

`
Gas density at 65°C: ρg = 1.0 kg/m³ (approximate, saturated)
Liquid density: ρl = 1,050 kg/m³ (5% NaOH solution)

Flow parameter:
X = (L/G) × √(ρg/ρl)
= 0.018 × √(1.0/1,050)
= 0.018 × 0.031
= 0.00056
`

For random packing (e.g., 50 mm Pall rings), the flooding line is approximately:

`
Capacity parameter at flooding: Y_flood ≈ 0.18 (from Sherwood correlation chart)
(at X = 0.00056 for Pall rings)
`

Calculate Flooding Gas Velocity

`
Y = (G'² × Fp × μl^0.2) / (ρg × ρl × g)

Where:
G' = gas mass velocity at flooding (kg/m²·s)
Fp = packing factor (50 mm Pall rings: ~25 m⁻¹)
μl = liquid viscosity (~1 cP for dilute NaOH = 0.001 Pa·s)

Rearranging for G':
G' = √(Y × ρg × ρl × g / (Fp × μl^0.2))
= √(0.18 × 1.0 × 1,050 × 9.81 / (25 × 0.001^0.2))
= √(1,854 / 6.3)
= √294
= 17.2 kg/m²·s
`

Design at 60-75% of Flooding

`
Design G' = 0.65 × 17.2 = 11.2 kg/m²·s
`

Calculate Tower Diameter

`
Cross-sectional area:
A = Gas mass flow / Design G'
= (60,000 / 3600) / 11.2
= 16.7 / 11.2
= 1.49 m²

Diameter:
D = √(4A/π) = √(4 × 1.49/π) = 1.38 m

→ Select 1.4 m ID tower
`

Rule of thumb check: Gas velocity should be 1.5-2.5 m/s for packed beds.

`
Actual velocity = 50,000 / (3600 × 1.54) = 9.0 m/s ← too high!
(Recalculate at actual conditions: 50,000 Nm³/h at 65°C and saturated)
Actual volumetric flow = 50,000 × (338/273) × (101.3/101.3) × 1.05 (moisture)
≈ 65,000 m³/h
Velocity = 65,000 / (3600 × 1.54) = 11.7 m/s → still too high
`

This indicates the 1.4 m diameter is too small. Let's resize:

`
For 2.0 m/s superficial velocity:
A = 65,000 / (3600 × 2.0) = 9.03 m²
D = √(4 × 9.03/π) = 3.4 m
`

→ Select 3.4 m ID tower. This is more realistic for 50,000 Nm³/h.


Step 5: Packing Height

Mass Transfer Approach

For absorption with chemical reaction (HCl + NaOH), the rate is controlled by gas-phase mass transfer:

`
HTU = Gas-phase height of a transfer unit
NTU = Number of transfer units

Packing height Z = HTU × NTU
`

Estimate HTU

For 50 mm Pall rings:

`
HTUog ≈ 0.4-0.8 m for HCl absorption (depends on L/G and gas velocity)

At our design conditions: HTUog ≈ 0.6 m
`

Calculate NTU

`
NTUog = ln(Cin/Cout) = ln(500/10) = ln(50) = 3.91
`

Packing Height

`
Z = HTUog × NTUog = 0.6 × 3.91 = 2.35 m
`

Add safety factor:
`
Design packing height = 2.35 × 1.3 = 3.0 m
`

Check with Rules of Thumb

  • Packed bed height ≥3.0 m for acid gas scrubbing ✓
  • Bed height / diameter ratio: 3.0/3.4 = 0.88 (acceptable range: 0.5-3.0) ✓
  • L/D ratio: Typically 1.0-3.0 for chemical absorbers ✓

Step 6: Pressure Drop

Use the Robbins correlation or packing manufacturer's curve:

`
For 50 mm Pall rings at 65% flooding:
ΔP ≈ 20-40 mm H₂O per meter of packing

Total packing pressure drop:
ΔP_packing = 3.0 m × 30 mm H₂O/m = 90 mm H₂O ≈ 880 Pa
`

Additional losses:

  • Mist eliminator: 100-250 Pa
  • Inlet/outlet duct transitions: 50-100 Pa
  • Stack: Negligible for short stacks

`
Total system ΔP ≈ 880 + 200 + 100 = 1,180 Pa
`

Fan Sizing

`
Fan power = (Q × ΔP) / (η_fan × η_motor)
= (65,000/3600 × 1,180) / (0.75 × 0.92)
= 21,300 / 0.69
= 30.9 kW

→ Select 37 kW motor (standard size with margin)
`


Step 7: Vessel Mechanical Design

Shell Thickness (Simplified)

For a 3.4 m diameter vessel at near-atmospheric pressure:

`
Per ASME VIII-1 (or GB 150):
t = (P × D) / (2 × S × E - 0.2 × P) + CA

Where:
P = design pressure (atmospheric + 0.05 MPa = 0.15 MPa)
D = 3,400 mm
S = allowable stress (SS316L: 115 MPa at design temp)
E = joint efficiency (0.85 for spot radiography)
CA = corrosion allowance (3 mm for scrubbing service)

t = (0.15 × 3,400) / (2 × 115 × 0.85 - 0.2 × 0.15) + 3
= 510 / (195.5 - 0.03) + 3
= 2.6 + 3
= 5.6 mm

→ Select 8 mm SS316L (minimum practical thickness for this diameter)

Internals

  • Liquid distributor: Trough or pipe type, minimum 40 pour points/m²
  • Packing support: Grid type for ceramic/plastic packing, gas injection type for metal
  • Mist eliminator: Chevron (vane) type, SS316L, 100 mm thick
  • Liquid redistribution: Every 5-6 m of packing height, or every 8-10 tower diameters, whichever is smaller. For 3 m of packing, no intermediate redistribution is needed.

Final Design Summary

Parameter Value
Scrubber type Counter-current packed bed
Tower diameter (ID) 3,400 mm
Packing type 50 mm Pall rings (PP or SS316L)
Packing height 3,000 mm
Scrubbing medium 5% NaOH solution
Liquid circulation rate 1-2 m³/h + recirculation (if used)
Superficial gas velocity ~2.0 m/s (at actual conditions)
Total pressure drop ~1,200 Pa
Fan motor 37 kW
Material of construction SS316L (shell), PP or SS316L (packing)
Removal efficiency >98% (HCl)
Mist eliminator Chevron type, SS316L

Common Design Mistakes

  1. Undersizing the diameter: A scrubber that’s too small floods at turndown. Always check velocity at actual (hot, wet) conditions, not Nm³/h.
  1. Forgetting the quench section: If inlet gas is >200°C, you need a quench section (empty spray zone) before the packed bed. Otherwise you’ll thermally shock and crack the packing.
  1. Inadequate liquid distribution: For towers >1 m diameter, a single-point liquid inlet produces uneven wetting. Use a proper distributor — the cost increment is small, the performance impact is huge.
  1. Wrong material for the mist eliminator: PP mist eliminators soften above 80°C. If your gas is saturated at 65°C but there’s an upstream temperature excursion, you lose the mist eliminator. Use SS316L for the first 500 mm above the packing.
  1. No recirculation control: If you’re recirculating scrubbing liquid, you must monitor pH and blow down when salts build up (NaCl for HCl scrubbing, Na₂SO₄ for SO₂). Otherwise, salts crystallize on the packing.

This guide covers the fundamentals. Each scrubber application has specific nuances — always consult the packing manufacturer’s data and run a pilot test for new applications.


📋 Free Environmental Engineering Templates

EHS compliance checklists, waste management logs, incident investigation forms — ready to download and use.

Browse Templates →   Work With Me →

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top